Specify Appertaining To Books Man and Superman
| Title | : | Man and Superman |
| Author | : | George Bernard Shaw |
| Book Format | : | Paperback |
| Book Edition | : | Special Edition |
| Pages | : | Pages: 288 pages |
| Published | : | September 28th 2000 by Penguin Classics (first published 1903) |
| Categories | : | Plays. Classics. Drama. Fiction. Philosophy. Theatre |
George Bernard Shaw
Paperback | Pages: 288 pages Rating: 3.88 | 3768 Users | 217 Reviews
Commentary As Books Man and Superman
Shaw began writing Man and Superman in 1901 and determined to write a play that would encapsulate the new century's intellectual inheritance. Shaw drew not only on Byron's verse satire, but also on Shakespeare, the Victorian comedy fashionable in his early life, and from authors from Conan Doyle to Kipling. In this powerful drama of ideas, Shaw explores the role of the artist, the function of women in society, and his theory of Creative Evolution. As Stanley Weintraub says in his new introduction, this is "the first great twentieth-century English play" and remains a classic exposé of the eternal struggle between the sexes.Be Specific About Books During Man and Superman
| Original Title: | Man and Superman |
| ISBN: | 0140437886 (ISBN13: 9780140437881) |
| Edition Language: | English |
| Characters: | Jack Tanner |
Rating Appertaining To Books Man and Superman
Ratings: 3.88 From 3768 Users | 217 ReviewsArticle Appertaining To Books Man and Superman
It's Nobel Revisit Month (it is a very small one-woman festival, so don't worry if you have never heard of it!), and "Man And Superman" is on the schedule, because I need to laugh a bit.I must have been laughing when I took notes on the treatise/reflection/play or whatever else it is, because I can hardly read my handwriting. Well, some people would now claim that it is never possible to read it, and that I should finally give up my cursive, but usually I myself know what I mean.Luckily, ShawThis was a super-size play! "Man and Superman" was a familiar title but I had no idea what it would be about. It turns out to be Shaw's revision of the Don Juan story. In the middle of the play, there is a long, self-contained dream sequence where the actors of the contemporary story appear as Don Juan, Dona Ana, the Statue (of Dona Ana's father, killed by Don Juan), and the Devil. This was quite amusing in itself and nailed down some of Shaw's main points of the play: male and female relations,
It's hard to rate this one, in a way. There were parts that were absolutely delightful. The first act is great, really funny, puts things in motion in a very entertaining way. Act 2 gets the job done. Act 3 starts well, then takes a wild metaphysical turn that's at first bracing and then horribly overextended. The play never quite recovers, but it's still got enough good lines that it's worth a read. I'm trying to imagine that perhaps it would play better on stage, but in fact it might be even
There are two things I've picked up over this year's literary intensive. One is that some books stay afloat due not to popular circulation, but outsized academic interest. The other is that it's appropriate to be skeptical of self-appointed social critics and truth-tellers. Socialist sophist George Bernard Shaw had the random misfortune to show up at the wrong end of the reading list with his table-pounding polemic "Man and Superman." I might be a bit biased for that.One is persuaded around the
No, not that Superman, dumbass. The other one. You know, Nietzsche? The Ãœbermensch? Blond beast? None of this rings a bell? What did you do at that fancy school of yours for four years? So anyway, Man and Superman is uber-bad. And now I dont know what to make of Shaw. Heartbreak House was unexpectedly awesome: smart, funny, pessimisticeverything you could ask for in a play. But this oneblech. A lumbering and tendentious monster. Its like a highbrow, 1905 version of All in the Family: no topical
I remember to have read one of the longest and most complicated monologues ever in this play ..I think I need to re-read it.
This play had both strengths and weaknesses. The dialouge was great, it wasn't the same old stuff, and it had a true sense of humor. However, it is a play of ideas, and dialouges while they are great for philosophy papers, do bring plays to a total halt, this play is full of those moments, most tellingly in the remake of Mozart's Don Juan in a dream sequence. One would think that the deft author of Candidia and Arms and Man would know this, but he doesn't. The play is full of references to the
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.