Online Books Consider the Lobster and Other Essays Download Free

Present Books In Pursuance Of Consider the Lobster and Other Essays

Original Title:	Consider the Lobster
ISBN:	0316156116 (ISBN13: 9780316156110)
Edition Language:	English

Consider the Lobster and Other Essays

David Foster Wallace

Hardcover | Pages: 343 pages

Rating: 4.23 | 37797 Users | 2845 Reviews

Declare Of Books Consider the Lobster and Other Essays

Title	:	Consider the Lobster and Other Essays
Author	:	David Foster Wallace
Book Format	:	Hardcover
Book Edition	:	First Edition
Pages	:	Pages: 343 pages
Published	:	December 13th 2005 by Little, Brown and Company
Categories	:	Nonfiction. Writing. Essays. Philosophy. Humor. Short Stories. Literature. American

Rendition Toward Books Consider the Lobster and Other Essays

Do lobsters feel pain? Did Franz Kafka have a funny bone? What is John Updike's deal, anyway? And what happens when adult video starlets meet their fans in person? David Foster Wallace answers these questions and more in essays that are also enthralling narrative adventures. Whether covering the three-ring circus of a vicious presidential race, plunging into the wars between dictionary writers, or confronting the World's Largest Lobster Cooker at the annual Maine Lobster Festival, Wallace projects a quality of thought that is uniquely his and a voice as powerful and distinct as any in American letters. Contains: "Big Red Son," "Certainly the End of Something or Other, One Would Sort of Have to Think," "Some Remarks on Kafka's Funniness from Which Probably Not Enough Has Been Removed," "Authority and American Usage," "The View from Mrs. Thompson's," "How Tracy Austin Broke My Heart," "Up, Simba," "Consider the Lobster," "Joseph Frank's Dostoevsky" and "Host."

Rating Of Books Consider the Lobster and Other Essays

Ratings: 4.23 From 37797 Users | 2845 Reviews

Write Up Of Books Consider the Lobster and Other Essays

The most striking thing about this set of essays by the late David Foster Wallace is that they are written in the familiar, cynical style of American gonzo journalism, but underneath that veneer they are the furthest thing in the world from cynical. They are deeply sincere, heartfelt and searching meditations on the most important questions all human beings face: meaning, suffering, identity, love, and our duties to each other. Although he was not religious in the way we think of that word, the

So let's get this out of the way: intellectually Wallace trounces Klosterman and Gladwell and still has more than enough left over to bounce David Brooks or any other pop-essayist du jour.This collection is actually better, more substantial, than the essays in "A Supposedly Fun Thing..." It's nothing I can exactly single out, except that this group of essays came across as more polished, professional, but no less amusing and illuminating. In the course of reading these, I've had the pleasure of

What a trip! DFW's fractured narrative feels more like a genuine conversation than anything else. The essays are insightful and thought provoking; but I feel they are aimed mostly at an American audience. I loved DFW's writing, especially the last piece where endnotes were boxed-in and merged with the body of essay itself; but asides from a chapter or two, a big bulk of the content was socio-political issues that hardly matter to a non-American.

Full disclosure: I have a major intellectual crush on David Foster Wallace. Yes, yes, I know all about his weaknesses - the digressions, the rampant footnote abuse, the flaunting of his amazing erudition, the mess that is 'Infinite Jest'. I know all this, and I don't care. Because when he is in top form, there's nobody else I would rather read. The man is hilarious; I think he's a mensch, and I don't believe he parades his erudition just to prove how smart he is. I think he can't help himself -

David Foster Wallace is a self-described SNOOT, the sort of person "who watched The Story of English on PBS (twice) and read Safire's column with their half-caff every Sunday." So, he's a bit of a know-it-all, and if you're like me, you'll feel like you're out of your league trying to keep up with him when it comes to grammar and all things English. But that's okay, because he's also witty and self-deprecating, and interested in not just English usage (thank goodness!), but also politics,

This felt like eating a piece of dessert that was left out for too long yet still managed to taste decent. I enjoyed reading "Consider the Lobster" but it felt a bit loose at parts, almost disorienting. Although I understand this wasn't a completed novel I still urge any readers of Wallace to check this out. It's nicely packaged inside and is quite sentimental at points. Took me a while but good read.

What I look for in a David Foster Wallace book is not so much his much-talked about brilliance, but his humanity. Under the verbal and visual tricks, there was a sensitive man who thought and felt deeply about everything he experienced. He was not what I expected from a "post-postmodern writer," which is to say that he was earnest and genuinely funny, and his writing style seems to be an organic representation of how his brain works, rather than something consciously literary. Reading him feels